이 름 전자우편 홈페이지 제목 비밀번호 (최소 4자이상의 영문 또는 숫자) Of course I don’t believe Justice Thomas reconstructs every case from first principles, Prof. Kerr. I think he has a basic conception of what the Constitution means, just like any principled judge, and he accepts precedents that fit within that meaning and rejects precedents that do not. I don’t see anything unusual about this approach, nor do I agree that any judge who does not rely on stare decisis has to reconstruct each and every case from first principles.