| NOTHING about the amicus brief, about the before judgment, and his/her assertion that it was unanimous was unfounded. He took a guess. Basically, his comments were akin to saying that Richard Simmons is gay. He doesn’t need inside information to do that — it’s just the obvious answer, and like the odds of Berg’s cert petition being granted, the odds of Richard Simmons being a womanizer just are long as hell. |
|
